State & Federal Regulatory News
|
March 10, 2007 |
News From The Massachusetts Marine Trades
Association
|
|
A Focus On Marine Industry State & Federal
Regulations
|
|
Massachusetts Storm Water Management
Changes
From The Desk of Jamy Buchanan Madeja,
Esq.
The existing Massachusetts Department of
Environmental Protection Storm Water Management Policy Manual has been
undergoing revisions for years. However, DEP has just now informed us it
will now be issued as official regulations instead. The regulations are
expected to be published for public comment in a few weeks, with a final
effective date sometime this summer.
While the existing policies are familiar, the language will change
as it becomes official regulation and therefore interpretations may well
change in important ways, as well.
So far, it is our understanding
that the intention of the new regulations is to use the existing wetlands
regulatory process to require more recharge of storm water to groundwater
and, in critical areas, a higher level of pretreatment. It is not expected that existing
facilities will be required to make any operational or structural changes
until such time as they seek to redevelop their sites or to obtain new
wetlands approvals. At that time, when such facilities go in for the usual
Order of Conditions from the local Conservation Commission, the facilities
are likely to be expected to meet a standard of "the maximum extent
practicable" recharging storm water to ground water, doing storm
water quality treatment and addressing peak discharge. Improving the local conditions would
also be expected. An example would be improving management of storm water
at the times of peak discharge to reduce local flooding conditions.
The
impact of the new regulations on marinas and boatyards and our members'
facilities is, of course, MMTA's special focus. Our Government Relations
and Legal Counsel, Jamy B. Madeja, Esq., will be participating in the
DEP's public process on MMTA's behalf, including a special meeting at DEP-Boston on MONDAY, March 12 at
2:30pm.
Any MMTA member who
wishes to be more fully informed, or who wishes to recommend a consultant
or engineer to participate in MMTA's informal technical advisory work
group, is welcome to contact her at 617-227-8410 or jmadeja@buchananassociates.com. We would welcome the
added expertise and appreciate very much the volunteer
spirit.
|
|
N.E. Marine Trades Association Environmental
Task Force Update
Since late 2006 volunteers from the MMTA have
participated in a new working group called the New England Marine Trades
Environmental Task Force. The
mission of this group, populated by a few representatives from each of the
New England State Marine Trade Associations,
is to engage and communicate with EPA-Region 1 in order to accurately
interpret and clarify various federal environmental regulations as they
pertain to marinas and boatyards.
In doing so, the Task Force intends to pass along clear, concise
information to its respective members and encourage
increased environmental regulatory compliance.
Formed shortly after two Rhode Island facilities were
cited with six-figure fines by the EPA for non compliance in the areas of
reporting, Clean Water Act violations and RCRA, this group of volunteers
is regularly communicating with EPA officials and requesting regulatory
clarity, explanations and advice.
Below you will find two (2) letters. The first is from the Task Force,
chaired by CT's Grant Westerson,
which asks for specific clarifications pertaining to Pressure washing
practices, the classification of boat owner waste at a marina and for
direction on the possibility of aggregating marina and boatyard
information for the purpose of characterizing certain waste streams
generated. Below you will find the
full text of each letter: please review them carefully as they contain many
helpful clarifications and cautions that should guide our collective best
management practices. DT: December 14, 2007 FR: New
England Marine Trades Association TO: Robert W. Varney, Regional
Administrator, US Environmental Protection Agency, Region
1 RE: Marina Environmental
Compliance Dear Mr.
Varney: In response
to EPA's recent enforcement initiative at marinas in New England, please be assured that the marina and boatyard
industry is responding as rapidly as possible to assess and improve its
environmental compliance. At the same time, the Marine Trades Associations
in each state in New England are attempting to
make their respective members aware of the seriousness of this initiative
and provide them with the tools that they require to properly address
these issues. EPA has gotten the
industrys attention.
Although we do not have an accurate accounting of the number of
marinas and boatyards that have fully assessed their environmental
compliance, taken corrective action and implemented environmental
management systems, we do know that a significant number of marinas have
completed this work. We are also aware that several of these marinas have
achieved, or are within (literally) weeks of achieving, Clean Marina
status as a result of this effort.
We are aware of dozens (if not more) of others that are in the
process of doing so. Also, in response to EPA's
recent determination that boat bottom wash water must be collected and
properly managed, please be advised that a substantial number of marina
owners throughout New England have spent the past six months actively
evaluating the available alternatives.
To date we are aware that systems in Maryland, Connecticut, Massachusetts and California have been inspected and
evaluated. In addition, vendors of
the available systems, and licensed disposal facilities have been
contacted. Pilot studies and
sampling and analysis of the wash water have been and continue to be
performed. It is our intention to
share this information with our membership. All of the states Marine Trade
Associations within EPA Region One have now formed a group with the goal
of effectively and efficiently compiling, evaluating and disseminating
information about these environmental compliance issues to marinas and
boatyards throughout New England, many of
whom are very small businesses.
Another goal of this group is to provide a single point of contact
with EPA to keep you apprised of our ongoing efforts and to work with EPA
on the resolution of issues specific to our industry, as they may arise.
The current plan is for representatives of each State's Trade Association
to establish a workshop and training/informational seminar schedule to
give members a plan for implementing the steps necessary to come into
compliance. The first of the planning sessions is set for January 9, 2007
at the Newton Holiday Inn. We fully recognize that it is
the responsibility of our industry to understand and comply with the
environmental laws and regulations that may affect it. However, as we develop training
seminars and begin disseminating information, it is critically important
that we convey accurate information to our members. We ask for your
staff's cooperation in assisting us in achieving this goal. In those cases
where a State has been delegated authority to administer a federal program,
we will also seek assistance from that State. Examples of the type of industry
specific assistance that we seek from EPA
include: RCRA
Questions: 1) Marinas are in the unique situation of having their
customers perform work on their own boats on marina property. These activities generate wastes that
are left at the marina. We have received guidance in the past that wastes
generated by private boat owners are considered household hazardous waste
and are excluded from regulation under RCRA. However, we have also been advised that once the waste
enters a marina's dumpster, the waste is subject to the hazardous waste
regulations. This is a significant
problem for marinas because our facilities are normally not staffed full
time making policing of our customer's actions virtually impossible. We need a definitive answer as to how
these wastes must be managed so that a plan can be developed and
disseminated to our customers. 2) Many maintenance processes
performed at marinas are virtually identical. For example, the bottom paints used by the marinas are
supplied by a limited number of manufacturers and the application of those
paints is the same. Therefore, we
expect several waste streams to be classified identically. As individual waste streams are analyzed
to confirm the classification of some of these waste streams, we expect to
build a database which will confirm the homogeneity of the specific waste
streams for classification purposes.
We believe that at some point enough data will be collected to
support the use of industry wide generator knowledge and would like EPA's
input on a Waste Analysis Plan that would substantiate the use of
generator knowledge for some of these waste streams in the
future. CWA
Question: 3) The investment in wash water treatment and
recirculation systems will be a substantial investment for any
marina. Before that investment is
made we need clear and consistent guidance from EPA and our State
environmental agencies to ensure that those systems will meet all
applicable regulations, now and in the foreseeable future. One of the many concerns we have is the
level of treatment that will be required in a wash water recycling system
before the water can be reused.
Another concern is that the levels of contaminates that can be
discharged to a sanitary sewer system may change in the foreseeable
future. If EPA or our State
environmental agencies are aware of pending changes we need to understand
them before significant investments are made for these
systems.
There are many other
nuance and smaller issues that would be resolved to better insure
compliance in marinas which we hope will be ironed out thru the process.
We look forward to your continued support and to a better and stronger
relationship as we move forward. Best wishes during
the holiday season. Grant W.
Westerson, Chairman
DT:
February 2, 2007 FR: Office of the Regional
Administrator, United States
Environmental Protection Agency Region 1 TO: New England Marine Trades
Association
Dear Mr. Westerson: Thank you for
your letter dated December 14, 2006. We are pleased that you and your
organization remain committed to helping New
England's marinas and boatyards comply with environmental
regulations. In particular, it is encouraging that your organization has
established a task force in this regard. We also appreciate that you plan
to keep the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) apprised of the
results of this work, and we look forward to these future communications.
Your leadership, of which this effort is indicative, will play a key role
in timely resolution of the compliance issues marinas face. Please
continue to let us know how we can continue to support your efforts.
In response to your questions
and concerns, I have consulted with my staff in each of the regulatory
program areas you raised, and below is our
response. Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) You requested clarification of federal RCRA regulations in certain
areas, and those clarifications are outlined below. Please bear in mind
that in New England, each state is authorized
to administer the RCRA program, and may have regulations, and
interpretations of regulations, that are more stringent than the federal
regulations. We are simply advising you regarding our interpretation of
the minimum federal requirements. You should check with each state
regarding any more stringent requirements or interpretations that may
apply.Household Hazardous Waste Exemption The federal regulations
found at 40 C.F.R. § 261.4(b) (l) exclude household hazardous waste from
RCRA Subtitle C regulation. Once a household hazardous waste is excluded
from the federal regulations, it remains excluded throughout the entire
waste management cycle as long as it is managed in accordance with
applicable RCRA Subtitle D regulations governing nonhazardous wastes,
and/or state law, and is not mixed with non-excluded hazardous wastes.
Forty C.F.R. § 261.4(b) (1) further defines a household to include day-use
recreation areas. Thus, household hazardous wastes generated by private
boat owners who use a marina as a day-use recreation area are within this
exclusion from federal regulation. Wastes from boat maintenance activities
such as paint scraping may fall within this exemption, if this is allowed
by the relevant state, provided that the work is conducted on private
boats by private boat owners. In our view, the exemption does not apply to
wastes generated by marina staff or contractors, including wastes from
work on marina-owned boats, wastes from work on commercial boats such as
commercial fishing boats, and wastes from work by marina staff or
contractors on private boats. We regard all such wastes as commercial
non-household wastes since the wastes are generated by a commercial
operation. The generation is not occurring within a household. The EPA
interpretation which includes paint scraping wastes from contractor work
done within a home as within the household hazardous waste exemption, thus
does not apply. Rather, such operations are similar to those in which work
is done on a personal automobile at a commercial shop or dry cleaning is
done at a hotel. These are both activities to which the household
hazardous waste exemption does not apply. Any household hazardous waste mixed with
non-exempt hazardous waste, such as commercial hazardous waste, loses its
exemption and is regulated [45 Fed. Reg. 33084, 33099 (May 19, 1980)]. The exemption
is also inapplicable to hazardous waste that is abandoned, or for which
the generator is unknown. For these reasons, boat owners placing household
hazardous waste into marina-owned dumpsters creates a complex issue. It may
not be possible to prove that any hazardous waste within a dumpster is
exempt household waste. You should consult with each authorized state
about the interpretations that apply. A state may require that the private
boat owner remove the waste to his residence in order to maintain the
exemption. A good practice in such a case would be for the private boat
owner to dispose of this waste only during a household hazardous waste
collection day. Another possible option would be to have a dumpster
dedicated/limited to receiving private boat owners' wastes, with
appropriate signs and controls.
Whether waste in such a dumpster would remain within the household
hazardous waste exemption is a matter of interpretation to be decided by
each state. As you may know, a growing trend is that many
marinas are conducting a "closed" operation, whereby no customer
do-it-yourself maintenance and repair work is allowed. This not only avoids
the problems discussed above, but also avoids potential contamination of
the marina property. Under various environmental laws, marina owners and
operators are liable for addressing any such contamination, even if it
results from activities by private boat owners. Waste
Analysis If
non-exempt (commercial) wastes are generated at a marina, the marina must
determine whether the wastes are hazardous, so as then to manage any
hazardous wastes in accordance with the hazardous waste requirements (40
C.F.R. § 262.11). The determination may be made based on sampling or
knowledge of the waste. See id. There are no regulations specifically
requiring the use of a Waste Analysis Plan to document generator knowledge
as the method of waste determination. However, documenting the basis for
the use of generator knowledge is a prudent practice. A database of
analyses for various manufacturers' products may be of use to your
members, as are Material Safety Data Sheets, and would be a good starting
point to document knowledge of the waste. But keep in mind that waste
determinations are dependent on how the specific generator, in this case
the individual marina, uses the material. For example, wastes may be mixed
with other materials or wastes, or may be cross-contaminated during use.
Accordingly, marinas need to exercise caution in using a database,
including being precise in making comparisons with database information.
Additional documentation at the marina level, possibly including sampling,
may be necessary to make a valid waste determination. In general, a
hazardous waste generator should rely on knowledge of the waste only if
he/she has a solid basis for being confident that a waste is not hazardous
in his/her particular circumstances. We would be pleased to answer any
further questions on what additional types of documentation may be
appropriate. Clean Water Act You cited the need for
clear and consistent guidance from EPA and states to ensure that certain
pressure wash systems meet all applicable regulations now and in the
foreseeable future. We can help accomplish this result by working with you
in identifying best management practices and common issues that marina
owners typically must address when making investment decisions in this
area. This information should help marina owners make good decisions
regarding pressure wash water control technology investments. For legal
reasons, however, we are not able to endorse any specific technology for
achieving compliance. Currently, there is a great deal of work going on
among the various marine trades associations, state environmental agencies
and EPA to identify these best practices and common issues. Through our
joint efforts, we anticipate that a list of these practices and issues
will be available for the marina community later this year. Regarding your
concerns about the level of treatment required in a wash water recycling
system, at this time there are no federal limitations on the amount of
pollutants that can be discharged into a municipal sewer system from
bottom boat washing. If the municipality does have an approved
pretreatment program, however, there may be local limitations that the
discharge must meet prior to discharge. Since local limitations are
site-specific to each municipality, they will differ from one Publicly
Owned Treatment Works (POTW) to another. Although local limitations are
usually in place for five to ten years, they may change based on revisions
to water quality, NPDES permit limits and/or sludge disposal practices. In
general, the likelihood of a high frequency of such changes is minimal;
however, for each situation it is unknown. It would thus be best for each
marina owner who is interested in this information to consult with their
local POTW for a useful perspective. Other Areas of Concern As you consider various
areas of focus with respect to your training activities, you may also wish
to include air quality and other regulatory programs in your outreach, as
well as pollution prevention. Certain activities may require marinas and
boatyards to comply with state or federal air quality regulations, or
obtain a permit. These activities include: cleaning or degreasing parts
using solvents; fiberglass and
aluminum boat manufacturing and repair; painting; sanding, scraping, or
similar operations that generate dust; operation of refrigeration units
that use Chlorofluorocarbons; installation and/or operation of
fuel-burning equipment such as boilers and generators; and any of the
above activities that generate objectionable odors and smoke. To determine
whether they are subject to these regulations, facilities need to be able
to accurately estimate their actual and potential emissions of air
pollutants, including air toxics. Facilities which dispense fuel are also
likely to be subject to state air quality requirements to install vapor
recovery systems, maintain the systems and keep records. There are also
many opportunities for your members to save money and achieve compliance
by pollution prevention, such as improved handling of toxic materials and
use of less-toxic substitutes. As you know, a
variety of environmental assistance tools have been developed in New England through partnerships established among
the various marine trades associations, state environmental agencies and
EPA. These include many marina owner workshops, guidance materials such as
the clean marina guides, and the Regional Marina
Website at
(http://www.epa.eov/reeionl/topics/water/marinas.html). We encourage you
to ask your members to use these tools as we continue our joint efforts to
improve compliance among New England's
marinas. In closing, we commend you on your plans to
help New England's marinas and boatyards
address the critical issues they face in complying with environmental
regulations. As questions arise, we are eager to provide answers as part
of our strategic efforts to help marinas comply with environmental
regulations. We value our partnership, and we hope you will continue to
count on our support. Our efforts will significantly improve both New England's industry and the
environment. Robert W. Varney, Regional Administrator
EPA-Region 1 Marinas |
|
FREE Marina Industry Regulatory Compliance
Workshops
MARCH 28 & 29, 2007 FREE WORKSHOPS: MARINA
INDUSTRY REGULATORY COMPLIANCE
Meeting The
Challenges of Pressure Washing, Storm Water & Hazardous Waste Material
Management
Wednesday,
March 28 @ Danversport Yacht Club
OR
Thursday, March 29 @ White's of Westport
Click Here To
Register For Free Marina Compliance Workshops |
|
Patrick Administration EOEA Management Team
Appointments
Secretary Bowles Names Additional Members of EOEA
Management Team In February, Secretary of
Environmental Affairs Ian Bowles announced three new members of the
management team for the Executive Office of Environmental Affairs (EOEA).
Ken Kimmell was appointed as EOEA's General Counsel.
Ken's private practice experience includes environmental and land use law.
Greg Watson was named Assistant Secretary for Clean Energy
Technology and will serve as EOEA's main point of contact for the clean
energy entrepreneurial community. Finally, Lisa Capone
was named EOEA Press Secretary, bringing her experience as a reporter,
editor, and columnist for State House News Service, Boston Globe North,
and other publications.
MA
Executive Office of Environmental Affairs |
|
Bruce Carlisle Named Acting Director of Coastal
Zone Management
On January 29, Ian Bowles, Secretary of Executive Office of
Environmental Affairs (EOEA) officially named CZM's Assistant Director,
Bruce Carlisle, as Acting Director of CZM. Bruce has
been with CZM for 13 years, previously serving as the manager of CZM's Wetlands Restoration
Program, as well as a policy and technical specialist in wetlands, water
quality, and habitat issues. Bruce and holds a Masters in Environmental
Policy from Tufts
University.
MA
Office of Coastal Zone Management |
|
NMMA Encourages Industry Comment on Proposed
Harmful Marine Diesel Rule
On March 2, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
announced proposal of a new rule that, if enacted, will negatively impact
U.S.-based megayacht builders and large sportfishing boat manufacturers
alike. The
Clean Locomotive and Marine Diesel Rule would set stringent emission
standards and require the use of advanced after-treatment technology to
reduce emissions on engines 2,000kW and larger—which sets the bar too low and establishes a
bad precedent for the ruling to eventually extend, encompassing smaller,
high-performance engines as well. Not only will large yacht
builders such as Palmer Johnson, Burger Boat Co. and Westport Shipyards be
affected by this rule, but it could also impact the large sportfishing
builders like Ocean Yachts, Viking, Hatteras and Bertram, which could, at
some point in the future, offer engines larger than 2,000 kW on their
sportfishing yachts 75 feet and above. The proposed standards intend
to reduce emissions of diesel particulate matter (PM) and nitrogen oxide
(NOx) from these marine diesel engines through a three-part program: (1)
Tightening emission standards for existing vessels when they are
re-manufactured; (2) Setting near-term, engine-out emission standards,
referred to as Tier 3 standards, for newly-built marine diesel engines;
and (3) Setting longer-term standards, referred to as Tier 4
standards, for newly-built marine diesel engines that reflect the
application of high-efficiency after treatment
technology. NMMA is encouraging all its Boatbuilder members to submit
comments to the EPA on this proposed ruling. Comments will be accepted for
90 days, beginning the day this proposal is published in the Federal
Register. All comments should be identified by Docket ID No.
EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0190 and submitted via internet, e-mail, mail or hand
delivery. Public hearings will also be held in Seattle and Chicago after
publication of the proposed rule in the Federal Register. For more information, contact
NMMA director of Environmental Safety & Compliance John McKnight at
(202) 737-9757; jmcknight@nmma.org. More information will follow as
the draft regulations become available.
Click
Here to View The Clean Locomotive & Marine Diesel
Rule |
|
MRAA News
MRAA and U.S. Power Squadrons Sign MOU Pledging
Cooperation
On Saturday, February 24, the
Marine Retailers Association of America and the United States Power
Squadrons signed a Memorandum of Understanding at the annual meeting of
the USPS in Jacksonville, Florida pledging to cooperate and work
together to further mutual goals of encouraging and promoting recreational
boating safety and the enjoyment of boating throughout the
U.S. According to the MOU, MRAA will be
responsible to provide contacts within marine retailing which are willing
to promote USPS boating safety classes and civic service projects, to post
key boating information on the MRAA web-site (www.mraasafeboating.com), and to provide appropriate MRAA
produced safety materials to the USPS. Editors Note: The following letter was
sent in response to a speech that Commandant Allen made to the National
Conference of State Legislatures in December of 2006. In this speech,
Commandant Allen suggested mandatory operator licensing for
boaters. Admiral Thad Allen, Commandant U.S. Coast Guard 2100 Second Street, S.W. Washington, D.C.
20593 Dear Admiral Allen: We are writing on behalf of the 3,500
members of MRAA to express our strong opposition to recent comments made
regarding a proposal of the Coast Guard to license recreational boaters.
MRAA is the national trade
association of small businesses which sell and service new and used boats
and operate marinas and accessory stores. MRAA has long supported
the activities of the Coast Guard, especially the very important work of
the Office of Boating Safety, in part, by serving on the National Boating
Safety Advisory Council and testifying before Congress in support of the Coast
Guard budget. During this time we have seen the hard work of many
organizations and individuals pay off with significant reductions in
boating fatalities and water-related accidents even with an expansion in the
definition of fatality without a re-statement of prior year's statistics.
At the same time of this dramatic reduction in fatalities, the number of
boats and the number of Americans who enjoy recreational boating have
increased three fold. We continue to look forward to working
with the Coast Guard to maintain the fatality decline line, but we do not
believe now is the time to initiate a mandatory licensing program. A
national boating license program does nothing to improve boating
safety or reduce terrorism, but does place a huge burden on the American
public. We are also concerned that forcing states to impose a licensing
program would be an unfunded mandate that is both unfair and
a violation of states rights. MRAA does believe it is imperative that all
other avenues of gaining safety on the water be explored and suggests
dealers can do more to encourage boat operator education and to
promote year-long safety awareness programs. With a better educated
boating public, MRAA believes the waters of America can remain safe and
free for all to enjoy. We look forward to continuing our outstanding
relationship with the Coast Guard. If there is anything MRAA and our members
can do to help improve boating safety, please let us
know. Sincerely, Phil Keeter, President Robert
Soucy, Chairman
Marine
Retailer's Assn Safe Boating |
|
Marine Tech Spring Training: Early Bird
Registration Extended!
MARCH 21-31, 2007 MMTET/AMTECH WORKSHOPS @ MASSASOIT CC CANTON
CAMPUS
Wednesday, March 21: Management Training for Marine Businesses
Thursday, March 22: Troubleshooting-Marine
Engines & Electrical
Friday, March 23: Computers & Introduction to Engine Diagnostics
Saturday, March 24: Electrical Systems: Troubleshooting & Theory
Tuesday, March 27: Sterndrive System Troubleshooting & Repair
Wednesday, March 28: Outboard
Systems Troubleshooting Made Simple
Thursday, March
29: Outboard Direct Fuel Injection (DFI)
Technology
Friday, March 30: 4-Stroke Outboard Systems & Troubleshooting
Saturday, March 31: Outboard
Hands-On Lab Session Summary
All
Full Day Courses Held @ Massasoit Community College's Canton Campus
EARLY BIRD REGISTRATION RATES EXTENDED
$ 150 MMTA Member - $200 Non
Member
Register For MMTET-AMTECH Workshops Here: |
|
Coast Guard Auxiliary Passes Resolution Urging
Mandatory Boating Safety Education
In their continuing effort to help save lives, the
United States Coast Guard Auxiliary recently passed a resolution urging
state legislatures to require mandatory boating safety education,
regardless of age.
The non-binding resolution, which was passed
unanimously at the Auxiliary National Training Conference in St. Louis, supplements a resolution passed in
2003. That resolution suggested
that boating safety education be required for anyone under the age of
sixteen operating a power boat or
personal watercraft.
The latest
resolution cites continuing evidence that indicates approximately 80
percent of fatalities occur on boats whose operators have not received any
form of boating safety education.
Moreover, statistics indicate that the average age of someone
involved in a boating fatality is around 38 years old, and thus, those
states who require mandatory classes for younger boaters have seen little
or no impact on their boating fatality statistics. The majority of states who have some form of
mandatory education tend to base the requirements on the operator's date
of birth (i.e. anyone born after January 1, 1986 would be required to take
a class). Anyone born before the
statutory date is exempt from the mandatory class requirements. Furthermore, some states like California, still have
no form of mandatory education requirement. The Coast Guard Auxiliary urges all boaters, including sailors
and paddle craft operators, to take a boating safety course approved by
the National Association of State Boating Law Administrators.
The United States Coast Guard
Auxiliary is composed of uniformed, non-military volunteer's who assist
the Coast Guard in all of its varied missions, except for military and
direct law enforcement. These men and women can be found on the nation's
waterways, in the air, in classrooms and on the dock, performing Maritime
Domain Awareness patrols, safety patrols, vessel safety checks and public
education. The United States
Coast Guard Auxiliary was founded in 1939 by an Act of Congress as the U.S.
Coast Guard Reserve and re-designated as the Auxiliary in 1941. Over 27,000
members donate millions of hours annually in support of Coast Guard
missions. For more information on the
United States Coast Guard Auxiliary, visit us at www.cgaux.org or
www.axupa.org
To
find a boating safety class in your area, click here |
|
Dock and Pier Management Inventory for New
England
The NOAA Coastal Services Center has released the free report,
Residential Docks and Piers: Inventory of Laws, Regulations, and Policies
for the New England Region. Coastal managers throughout the nation face
challenges in managing the aesthetic, environmental, navigational, and
public-access impacts of dock and pier growth. Through easy-to-use tables,
this publication compares state strategies for managing residential docks
and piers.
Note: MMTA has not
verified that the material contained in the above report is complete nor
accurate. Whenever possible consult current regulations and laws
governing your facility or service-or consult an environmental compliance
professional.
Free
Inventory of Laws, Regulations & Policies |
|
N.O.A.A. is 200 !
In 2007, NOAA
celebrates its 200th anniversary. NOAA was created in 1807 by President
Thomas Jefferson to provide nautical charts to the American maritime
community. Efforts to protect fisheries date back to 1871 and, in 1882,
the USS Albatross became the first government research vessel built
exclusively for fisheries and oceanographic research.
Today,
NOAA's Office of Coast Survey holds more than 20,000 historical nautical
charts and continually updates its collection of 1,000 current charts.
NOAA also operates a system of 16 satellites and the National Weather
Service, and oversees coastal management. NOAA researchers and employees
work daily to enhance weather forecasts; provide longer warning lead times
for natural disasters; and enhance our understanding and management of our
climate, oceans, and atmosphere.
See the NOAA Celebrates 200
Years website for details.
NOAA
Celebrates 200 Years |
|
Upcoming Events
MARCH 26-31, 2007 ADVANCE MARINA MANAGEMENT COURSE By
IMI Newport, RI www.marinaassociation.org
APRIL 2,
2007- PROMOTING NEW ENGLAND'S MARINE ECONOMY FORUM Roger
Williams University School of Law Bristol, RI www.rwu.edu/Administration/marineforum/agenda/ MAY 3, 2007 -
BENJAMIN FRANKLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SPRING FUNDRAISER Boston, MA http://www.bfit.edu MAY 6 - 8, 2007 - AMERICAN BOATING CONGRESS Washington, DC www.nmma.org/abc MAY 9-11, 2007 - WORKING WATERWAYS &
WATERFRONTS Norfolk, Virginia www.wateraccess2007.com MAY 4, 2007 -
FUTURE OF MASSACHUSETTS BEACHES: RELOCATE, NOURISH OR LOSE THEM
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution www.whoi.edu/seagrant
Home
Page of the Massachusetts Marine Trades Association |
|
Links Of Interest
Renew Your Membership Online! https://ssl3.pair.com/bythesea/cgi-bin/quickstore/boatma-renew/order.pl
MA Legislation That MMTA Tracks: http://www.boatma.com/membersonly/pdf/mmta_legis_tracking_list_march_02_2007.pdf Boater
Information Pipeline Sign up: http://www.boatma.com/boatersenewssignupform.html Looking to Hire? Go To: http://www.boatma.com/jobswanted/bbs.pl Looking For Work? Go To: http://www.boatma.com/jobs/bbs.pl Looking For The Latest Info? http://www.boatma.com/membersonly/news/bbs.pl Proudly Display the MMTA Logo http://www.boatma.com/membersonly/mmtalogos.html E-Mail
Changes? Send them to webmaster@boatMA.com Want To Advertise @
BOATMA.COM? http://www.boatma.com/membersonly/banneradinfo.html Link to Archived
ENews http://www.boatma.com/membersonly/archivednl.html
Click Here To Visit MMTA
Members Only Page |
|
|
Preamble To Massachusetts Marine
Trades Association By Laws c. 1964
The Purpose For The Formulation Of The Massachusetts
Marine Trades Association Is To Establish An Organization Of Dedicated Men
And Women Who Are Employed In The Marine Industry With The Concept That
This Organization Will Provide The Framework For Furthering The Interests
Of The Marine Trades And The Boating Public Through The Promotion Of
Boating, Participation In Legislation And Professional Improvement
Programs. It Is Further Hoped That
The Association Will Be The Focal Point For Exchange Of Ideas Concerning
Marine Matters And That A High Standard Of Professional And Ethical
Conduct Will Be Adhered To By The Membership.
Massachusetts Marine Trades
Association T/F: 617.296.8336 E: info@BoatMA.com W:
www.BoatMA.com
|
|